A short letter about how this product came out of a real situation, what it is, and what it isn't.
The first time I sat down to write a reply to a high-conflict message, it was 11 PM, my hands were shaking, and the version I drafted in my Notes app was the worst thing I have ever written. I read it back the next morning and was grateful — genuinely grateful — that I had not pressed send.
The next time it happened, two days later, I almost didn't catch it.
If you're reading this page, you probably know exactly what I'm describing. The message arrives at the moment you're least equipped to read it. The accusations don't quite make sense, but the panic is total. You spend an hour drafting a response that explains everything, refutes every point, defends every choice — and then you spend the rest of the night unable to sleep. The cycle is exhausting, and it's expensive, and it doesn't end when the divorce is final. In my case, it has not ended.
I tried what everyone tries. I asked a free chatbot. It told me, sincerely, to "try to see things from their perspective." I asked it again with more context. It told me to be empathetic. It does not understand what is happening. The model has no concept of high-conflict dynamics, no understanding that some communications are designed to provoke a reaction that can be screenshotted later, no awareness of what a custody evaluator reads. It just wants everyone to get along, and it cannot tell when one person is operating in a different game.
I wanted a tool that did three things, all at once:
One — read the message the way a forensic psychologist would read it. Pattern first, content second. Not "is this person being mean," but "what is this message structurally doing." DARVO, gish gallop, manufactured urgency, deflection — the patterns are real, they have names, and once you see them you cannot unsee them.
Two — write the reply the way a family-court attorney would. Not the long, vindicated, point-by-point rebuttal the panic part of my brain wanted. The short, factual, bulletproof reply that looks reasonable on a printout to a judge. Brief. Informative. Friendly. Firm. Four words. The single most important thing I learned during the worst year of my life.
Three — keep a record without me having to think about it. So that when the next custody evaluation, modification, or contempt motion came around, I had a timeline I could hand to my attorney instead of an inbox of trauma.
Nothing existed that did all three. Therapy is for the inside of your head. Lawyers are for filings, not 11 PM Tuesday text replies. Co-parenting apps log messages but don't help you write them. Generic AI is fluent and emotionally illiterate.
Compass is the tool I built for myself first, and then opened up because dozens of friends and friends-of-friends were going through versions of the same thing. It does the three things above, every time, on any message, on any device, including the phone you're reading this on at 11 PM.
It is opinionated. It will tell you when your draft reply is too long. It will name patterns out loud — by their actual clinical and legal names — so you can talk to your attorney and your therapist about them precisely. It will not validate revenge or escalation. It will not tell you that your spouse is a narcissist; that's a clinical diagnosis no AI should make and no responsible product should pretend to. It will tell you that this specific communication uses these specific patterns, and here is what to do about this specific reply.
The most consistent piece of feedback I get from members is some version of: "I wish I'd had this two years ago." That's the bar. That's what I'm building toward.
It is not a lawyer. It is not a therapist. It is not a substitute for either, and the moments it most makes you feel like you don't need either are usually the moments you most need both. If your case involves abuse, danger to children, or a protective order, please use Compass alongside the actual professionals — not instead of them.
It is not a way to win. There is no winning a high-conflict separation in any meaningful sense. There is only the cost of doing it badly versus the cost of doing it well, and Compass is built to lower the second one.
It is not a community or a forum. Reddit has those, and they're a mixed blessing. Compass is private, one-on-one, and quiet. The conversations you have with it are between you and you.
I want you to write fewer 11 PM messages and sleep more. I want you to walk into your next attorney meeting with a five-page timeline instead of a sob and a phone full of screenshots. I want your kids' co-parenting log to look, on paper, exactly the way it would look if you were the most reasonable parent on Earth — because most of the time, when you stop reacting, that's actually who you become.
If Compass helps you do any of those three, it's done its job.
And if it doesn't — email me. Not a support address. Not a help desk. The address below comes to me. If something is missing, broken, or wrong, I want to know.
— The Compass team
P.S. — If you're reading this in the parking lot of a courthouse, the supervised-visitation center, or a school pickup, with shaking hands: you're going to be okay. Take a breath. Then take another one. Then come inside.
Built by someone who's been there
Two-click cancel. 7-day refund if it isn't right.